Yes, I am aware that Volvo Car Corporation has been sold to Zhejiang Geely Holding Group. We, the employees, was informed by the newspapers, same as everyone else...
Read more about it from Gasgoo Autonews, Detroit News, Dagens Industri and Göteborgsposten (the latter two in Swedish).
29 March 2010
Some more thoughts on agility and architecture
This is a quote from Grady Booch's blog:
One interpretation I can make of this quote is that it seems to be an inherent contradiction in aiming for agility in the design decisions that constitutes the architecture. Architecture is those decision that you don't want to change since it is costly to do so (in $$$, man hours or lead-time). But this is not the same as making those decisions up-front.
Maybe a lean approach is what benefits agile development the most:
SEI has a webinar 22 April about Agile Development & Software Architecture. Maybe that can shed some more lights on how to reconcile architecture and agility. To bad they are broadcasting it at such an awkward time for us in Europe.
All architecture is design but not all design is architecture. Architecture represents the significant design decisions that shape a system, where significant is measured by cost of change.
One interpretation I can make of this quote is that it seems to be an inherent contradiction in aiming for agility in the design decisions that constitutes the architecture. Architecture is those decision that you don't want to change since it is costly to do so (in $$$, man hours or lead-time). But this is not the same as making those decisions up-front.
Maybe a lean approach is what benefits agile development the most:
...an architect should make as few decisions as possible, deferring the rest until later in the lifecycle.Tyree and Akermann in IEEE Software 22(2), 2005, pp. 19-27.
SEI has a webinar 22 April about Agile Development & Software Architecture. Maybe that can shed some more lights on how to reconcile architecture and agility. To bad they are broadcasting it at such an awkward time for us in Europe.
27 March 2010
Authors of the top papers...
Good news, but more work...
Dear Ulrik and Carl,
We are pleased to inform you that your research paper,
"A Case Study of the Architecture Business Cycle for an In-Vehicle Software Architecture",
has been selected to be extended and submitted to a Special Issue of the Journal of Systems and Software (JSS).
This JSS Special Issue will include the extended and revised best papers selected from the 2009 Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture & European Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA/ECSA 2009).
Indeed, we announced at WICSA/ECSA 2009 that extended versions of best papers of WICSA/ECSA 2009 would be selected to be submitted to JSS.
We have better news: our cooperation with JSS was upgraded to have this year a JSS Special Issue including the best papers of WICSA/ECSA 2009, instead of submitting papers that would be included in different issues.
Based on review scores and reviewer comments, we are inviting authors of the top papers to substantially extend (at least 30% of new material) their papers and submit them to this Special Issue. Congratulations on being included in this select group.
...snip...
Looking forward to hearing from you and hoping that you will accept our invitation to contribute to this Journal Special Issue.
Yours Sincerely,
Flavio Oquendo, Eltjo Poort, Judith Stafford
JSS Guest Editors (Program Chairs of IEEE/IFIP WICSA/ECSA 2009)
19 March 2010
Auto news sites
Some sites for those who want current news about the automotive industry:
Gasgoo Automotive News - the most in-depth information I have found so far about the global automotive industry, maintained by China's largest automotive B2B marketplace...
Detroit News Auto Insider - marginally better than Gasgoo on "the big three", but lacks on the rest of the world.
Auto Bild and Auto, Motor und Sport are two major German auto magazines with extensive websites. It helps if you know German. The latter also have an ambitious Swedish website.
Ny Teknik Fordon - Sweden's largest technology newspaper focusing on technology (what else?). Good on Volvo and Saab, in Swedish.
Dagens Industri Bil & Motor - Car news from Sweden's largest business newspaper. Also in Swedish...
Gasgoo Automotive News - the most in-depth information I have found so far about the global automotive industry, maintained by China's largest automotive B2B marketplace...
Detroit News Auto Insider - marginally better than Gasgoo on "the big three", but lacks on the rest of the world.
Auto Bild and Auto, Motor und Sport are two major German auto magazines with extensive websites. It helps if you know German. The latter also have an ambitious Swedish website.
Ny Teknik Fordon - Sweden's largest technology newspaper focusing on technology (what else?). Good on Volvo and Saab, in Swedish.
Dagens Industri Bil & Motor - Car news from Sweden's largest business newspaper. Also in Swedish...
9 March 2010
Ford's new infotainment
It should come as no surprise that Ford is one of the leading automotive companies when it comes to infotainment systems and vehicle connectivity. Read an in-depth interview with Alan Mulally on the topic.
The new Ford My Touch just confirms this position. As an architect I am impressed by how they manage to coordinate suppliers as Gracenote, Nuance, Sony and Verizon into what appears as a seamless system based on Microsoft Auto, a system that can directly use services from Inrix, Pandora, Stitcher, Telenav and Twitter.
One side effect of connecting the vehicle with everyting else is the security of the information stored in the car, as described in this blog by Steve Cypher
Read what other blogs have to say about Ford My Touch.
The new Ford My Touch just confirms this position. As an architect I am impressed by how they manage to coordinate suppliers as Gracenote, Nuance, Sony and Verizon into what appears as a seamless system based on Microsoft Auto, a system that can directly use services from Inrix, Pandora, Stitcher, Telenav and Twitter.
One side effect of connecting the vehicle with everyting else is the security of the information stored in the car, as described in this blog by Steve Cypher
Read what other blogs have to say about Ford My Touch.
5 March 2010
Is software a product of creativity? Or?
I think the phrase "development process", or rather the concept of development as a process has become a paradigm in software. A google search on software development process results in 724 000 000 hits!
The view of creating software is done through a "development process" is so established, at least in the software industry, that no-one seem to question if this is a valid view on how to design stuff. This regardless if one talks about waterfall, spiral, agile or lean.
Since I am not a native English speaker it could be a lack understanding the connotation of the words, but I'll try to explain what I mean.
First, software is developed. No-one talks about a software creation process. To me development is more akin to refinement, exploitation or progress. I think software is created, it is one of the very few intellectual pursuits besides the arts where something is created from nothing.
Second, the development (or creation) is done through a process, something which in an engineering perspective means that by combining the right inputs and having the right circumstances, a desired output is achieved. And the process is repeatable as long as the inputs and circumstances are the same. I don't think anyone disagrees when I say that not two software projects are alike, regardless how similar one tries to keep the process.
So the question is how should we view software creation? I think it would be helpful to see it as a creative endeavour similar to what a writer does. There is usually some idea of what the end result should be, but that may or may not be very detailed when starting to make sentences. Some write in a very linear fashion, starting with the first chapter. Some start with an outline which gets more and more refined until it actually is the full text. Some writers are very disciplined and can write for 8 hours day, some can just write when they are inspired. And everybody has heard about "writer's block"...
If software is not developed in a process, but seen as a work of creativity I think efforts should be to make the people writing software as creative as possible (and therefore also productive). Maybe this can be used as a "lean" principle on how to manage a software project.
The view of creating software is done through a "development process" is so established, at least in the software industry, that no-one seem to question if this is a valid view on how to design stuff. This regardless if one talks about waterfall, spiral, agile or lean.
Since I am not a native English speaker it could be a lack understanding the connotation of the words, but I'll try to explain what I mean.
First, software is developed. No-one talks about a software creation process. To me development is more akin to refinement, exploitation or progress. I think software is created, it is one of the very few intellectual pursuits besides the arts where something is created from nothing.
Second, the development (or creation) is done through a process, something which in an engineering perspective means that by combining the right inputs and having the right circumstances, a desired output is achieved. And the process is repeatable as long as the inputs and circumstances are the same. I don't think anyone disagrees when I say that not two software projects are alike, regardless how similar one tries to keep the process.
So the question is how should we view software creation? I think it would be helpful to see it as a creative endeavour similar to what a writer does. There is usually some idea of what the end result should be, but that may or may not be very detailed when starting to make sentences. Some write in a very linear fashion, starting with the first chapter. Some start with an outline which gets more and more refined until it actually is the full text. Some writers are very disciplined and can write for 8 hours day, some can just write when they are inspired. And everybody has heard about "writer's block"...
If software is not developed in a process, but seen as a work of creativity I think efforts should be to make the people writing software as creative as possible (and therefore also productive). Maybe this can be used as a "lean" principle on how to manage a software project.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)